Nelson Bros Engineering Scanner / Optimizers
Board Edger Description
www.millsmart.com/edger.html - (360)951-2737 - Updated 5-Dec-2010
NBE has installed over 70 Board Edger
Optimizers. Prior to starting NBE, Rod Nelson developed optimization
programs for several "Big Vendors". He is a "self
proclaimed" expert on optimization, though many people believe his brother
is the real brains in the outfit and that Rod is just another "pretty face".
Scanners
There are two basic methods of scanning
boards. One is the Transverse Scanner where the board travels laterally
thru a scanner that spans the length and thickness of the board. Two is
the Lineal Scanner, where the board travels lineally thru a scanner that spans
the width and thickness of the board.
Transverse scanners can be differential (top and bottom) or top
only. Boards are normally conveyed thru the transverse scanner on a
lugged chain or between hook stops on a slick chain. Our earlier systems
used scan heads with multiple single points lasers on 3” or 1” centers. Some other early configurations of the
multipoint scanners included a thru beam light-curtain with beams every
1/4" or 1/2" to improve width and length resolution.
Since 2005 we have switched to line laser
profiling heads like the JoeScan JS-20 head.
Surround scan configurations consist of 3 banks of heads that get data
side data as well as top and bottom. A
staggered, surround system gets real data on the ends if length accuracy of
+/-0.1” is needed. For some edger
application we can us 1 or 2 banks of heads that scan from the top.
Lineal scanners are normally top only or top and sides. Boards
are normally conveyed thru the lineal scanner on a belt or feedchain.
Differential scanning (i.e. top / bottom) is possible, but requires a break in
the scan belt to get access to the bottom of the board. The most simple
lineal scanners has a single scan zone with a line laser profiling head on each
side. The length of runway from the lumber line thru the scan zone to the
edger can be a problem for some mills. The most simple lineal scanner
consisting of a rollcase feeding a belt conveyor thru one scan zone requires a
runway of 2 to 3 board lengths. A shorter runway is possible if a centering
infeed table is used with multiple scan zones. Kockums and Ahlstrom
introduced the multizone scanner with centering infeed in the late 80's,
McGehee (with NBE’s help) rekindled the lineal system in 1997. Now most vendors are switching to the lineal
system.
NBE has installed over 40 lineal scanners on
new new edgers and upgrades to the earlier lineal systems. We currently
use the JS-20 scan head from JoeScan on lineal edgers as well as log and curved
cant systems.
Customers are continually saying that the
lineal system just won't fit. My answer is that the price of a building
add-on and some conveyors is cheaper than a Positioning Table and a Transverse
Scanner. Ask your maintenance people if they would rather maintain a roof
or a Positioning Table!!!!!!!
NBE's Opinion is that simplicity and accuracy is most
important. Therefore the single zone lineal is best, then the multizone
lineal, and lastly the transverse with positioning table. NBE wrote an
article for the July/August, 2001 issue of the Timber Processing magazine
explaining the benefits of lineal scanning (refer to link at end of this
webpage).
Things to consider when selecting the
scanner:
Optimization
NBE has the best Optimization. OK, I
may be biased, so you should not take me on my word.
So how do you select one. When I was a young
electrical engineer, people would ask me what TV to buy. My answer was to
list your requirements, read the specifications on all of the candidate TV's,
write up an assessment chart, make the wrong decision and live with
it. No one ever asked my advice after that.
So how do you really select a scanner /
optimizer. Well you need to address the following:
1. Does it do what I want?
2. Can it be maintained?
3. Does it have the best Return on Investment?
4. Am I getting an exact copy
1. Does it do what I
want? To keep from having to
write a book, I will list the most important capabilities of the NBE edger
optimizer:
Like any vendor, we can do
anything, but you should know what exists and what is new. Then, keep in
mind that new tends to be a bad word.
The following
block diagram is for a lineal board edger. The optimizer computer is
networked to the scan heads and to the supervisor's switching hub. The
switching hub allows multiple monitor computers to display the optimizer
solutions or get reports without any burden on the optimizer's network.
NBE's
Single Zone Lineal Board Scanner.
Click image for large picture.
The most
important display is the following solution screen. It gives a graphical
display of the solution in real-time, a profile plot, a list of the last 100
boards, plus some production and decision text. This screen is
displayed on the optimizer, supervisor and any monitor computers. The
optimizer's monitor is normally positioned within the operator's view.
The
NBE's Supervisor's Solution Screen
NBE's
solution screen for the RANDOM WIDTH edger optimizer.
Now we are ready for the second major
requirement
2. Can it be maintained? Anything can be maintained, the question
should be, "what is the cost of maintenance?" The ideal system
never fails, never needs to be calibrated and is so simple you never need to
call the vendor for help. Sadly, even NBE's system is not ideal.
To determine the cost of maintenance, you
need to address the following questions:
Obviously, you need a Crystal
Ball to answer the 5 year questions. But, do not assume the bigger vendor
is always more safe. The big vendors disappear or get acquired (code word
for no longer supported) as often as small vendors.
NBE approach is to keep it simple and do not
hide obvious charges:
So once you believe it meets
your needs and that is will still be running in 5 years, it is time to look at
the ROI.
3. Does it have the best Return on
Investment? There are many
approaches for assessing the economics. Whatever assessment you use, you
will need to define the following:
When mills buy a system they tend
to focus on production (pieces per minute), recovery (98% to 99% of something),
system cost (not total cost) and the installation schedule (can you deliver in
6 weeks). Since vendors all promise the same thing, mills usually rely on
cost and confidence to make the selection.
During installation people usually wish they
spent more time scheduling, selecting the startup people and buying the spare
parts.
Shortly after installation people wish they
did more training and had a better understanding of the warranty. They
usually are wondering if the promised piece rate was an exaggeration.
Eight months after installation, people who
relied on "gut feel" are wishing they spent more time on their
resume.
I could continue, but this type of humor does
not sell many systems.
The best advice I can give is "if the
vendor can't show you a system doing exactly what you want, then you should
always question their ability to do what you want".
If you ask for something, beyond the current
state of the art, be prepared. On any new technology, always have a full
factory acceptance test. Do not accept shipment until all requirements
are met.
Always specify the startup people. See NBE Startups
Define your recovery test or understand the
vendor's test. Things to watch for:
Conclusion, Buy NBE.
LINKS TO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION |
|
NBE Article in Timber Processing on Lineal versus Transverse Scanning |
|